You've been inactive for a while, logging you out in a few seconds...
It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try a search?
The weaknesses of the Mythicist hypothesis multiply when its proponents turn to coming up with their own explanation as to how the Jesus stories did arise if there was no historical Jesus. Of course, many of them don't really bother much with presenting an alternative explanation and leave their ideas about exactly how this happened conveniently vague. But some realize that we have late first century stories that all claim there was an early first century person who lived within living memory and then make a series of claims about him. If there was no such person, the Mythicist does need to explain how the stories about his existence arose and took the form they do. And they need to do so in a way that accounts for the evidence better than the parsimonious idea that this was believed because there was such a person. This is where Mythicism really falls down. The Mythicist theories fall into four main categories:
Rely on professional writers with your college paper and take a load off your mind. Relax while we are working on your essay.
Your peace of mind is just one click away
Julius Caesar is the most famous Roman dictator of all time, which is why William Shakespeare chose to base his very first tragic play after him. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar takes place in Rome when Julius Caesar was the potent leader. Although Julius Caesar was a real Roman dictator, the play is not completely accurate historically. There are numerous falsehood throughout the tragedy such as the frightening omens leading up to Caesars death. The relationship of Caesar and his companion in the play, Mark Antony, is not historically correct according to many scholars. Lastly, the displayed version of Caesar’s death is inaccurate in many areas. On the other hand, Shakespeare used much of Rome’s history to create this tragedy and used sources such as conspiracy, Caesar’s wife, and real Roman senators to create what seems like real life history. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is based on historical events, however Shakespeare used many fallacious factors to display the tragedy. Shakespeare composed many falsehoods in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar like the obscure omens, the friendship of Julius Caesar and Mark Antony, and the details of Caesar’s death. Shakespeare also uses many truths in the play such as the occurrence of, Calpurnia, his wife’s dream and the idea of conspiracy.
An omen is defined as an event regarded as a portent of good or evil; Shakespeare uses omens in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar to foreshadow the death of the tragic hero, Julius Caesar. Obviously the chances of most of the omens really occurring is quite impossible, but many historians believe a few of the omens were real. One of the most prominent omens in the play came from Caesar’s real wife, Calpurnia. The night before Caesar’s death Calpurnia dreamed of “Caesar as a fountain running blood,” (Ronan). This dream became reality in the next day, when Caesar was stabbed and the conspirators bathed their hands in blood. Julius Caesar’s real wife, Cal...
I found the information to be very helpful and this site itself.